AXON Q4 FY25 — Refresh Post Axon Week & Drawdown (WSM)

Date: 2026-04-28 Quarter: Q4 FY25 (Dec 2025) — refresh, not new print Prior thesis: Strengthening (Q4 FY25 review, Feb 25) Updated thesis: Strengthening — and now valuation finally cooperates


Verdict

The thesis got stronger and the price got cheaper. That is the setup I sit on my hands for. Stock down ~33% in 90 days from ~700to 403 with zero company-specific bad news. Axon Week (Apr 7-10) delivered exactly what the 2028 model needed: Axon Vision (real-time AI on live video), CJIS-compliant Axon Assistant rolled across the ecosystem, Axon 911 cloud EOC infrastructure shipping. EV/TTM Rev compressed from ~14x at print to ~11.7x. FY26 EV/Rev ~9.0x. For a company growing 33%+, FCB $14.4B (+43%), NRR 125%, 25.5% EBITDA, 2028 line-of-sight to $6B/28% — this is the cleanest entry the market has given me on AXON since the Prepared deal. I am adding to equity. The LEAPS stay put.


What Has Actually Changed Since Feb 25

Nothing in the fundamentals. Two things in the world.

1. Axon Week Delivered the AI Roadmap (Apr 7-10, Nashville)

Launch What My read
Axon Vision Real-time AI on live video — object/event detection, threat awareness The ecosystem moat extending into the live operations layer. Body camera + ALPR + Fusus all feeding one AI inference layer.
Axon Assistant — expanded CJIS-compliant, rolled across full ecosystem (not just officer-facing) Compliance was the unlock for federal / state agency adoption. 500 customers in year one was small ball — this is the scale-up.
Axon 911 Cloud EOC infrastructure — Carbyne stack now under Axon brand The 911 product I bought the Jan'28 LEAPS for is shipping. On schedule.

→ Everything Rick Smith promised on the Q4 call landed. No slippage. The "responsible AI as competitive superpower" framing from the Q4 letter now has product behind it. Underpromise / overdeliver intact.

2. The Stock Got Cheap

At Print (Feb 24) Today (Apr 28) Change
Price ~$700 ~$403 -42%
Market Cap ~$57.5B ~$32.4B -44%
EV/TTM Rev ~14x ~11.7x -16%
EV/Fwd Rev (FY26 mid) ~10.4x ~9.0x -13%
Run-rate P/S (Q4×4) ~18x ~10.2x -43%

Note the gap between price (-42%) and multiple (-16%). The rest came from earnings/run-rate growth catching up under the price. Time has done a lot of the rerating; this is not solely sentiment.

No company-specific bad news during the window. Bookings, ARR, NRR all improved. TD Cowen reiterated Buy with $825 PT on April 15 — calls it multiple compression, not thesis break. 16-analyst consensus Strong Buy, avg PT $758. I agree with the framing.


Position Math — Where I Actually Stand

Component Feb 25 sizing Today sizing (price impact) Action
Equity (common) 6.1% ~3.6% (-42%) Add to ~7%
LEAPS Jan'28 $440C 6.3% ~2-3% (deep OTM hurts) Hold — do not roll yet
Total exposure ~12.4% ~5.6-6.6% (compressed) Re-build to ~10-11% via equity adds

The LEAPS are the painful part. Strike $440, spot $403 — they're $37 OTM with ~21 months to expiry. They're not dead. Implied vol on AXON has expanded with the drawdown so the optionality is still meaningful. But I bought them when the stock was over the strike and now I'm wishing I'd sized smaller. I will not roll them down — that's locking in a loss to chase delta. I'll let them work or expire. Lesson logged: when the LEAPS strike sits 10-15% above spot, I should size at half.

The equity is where I add. At 11.7x EV/TTM Rev for 33% growth and accelerating ARR, this is below the band I'd pay for a top-quintile compounder. Adding 3-4% to equity gets total exposure back to ~10-11%, which is appropriate for the conviction level given the LEAPS are now lower-delta optionality.


What the Bear Could Still Get Right

Naming it directly so I'm honest with myself:

  1. Q1 FY26 (May 2026) is the next test. If revenue prints ≤27% YoY and gross margin doesn't show improvement, the FY26 guide ceiling at 30% becomes a floor and the multiple stays compressed. I add now knowing this is 2-3 weeks away. Not a reason to wait — by my framework, drawdowns with thesis intact get bought.
  2. GM compression is structural until proven otherwise. 57.9% GAAP GM in Q4. Bagley said full-year tariff drag in H1 FY26, recovery H2. I'll grade this on Q3/Q4 FY26, not Q1. But it must trend up.
  3. LEAPS expiry tax. Jan'28 means ~21 months. The 911 and enterprise revenue is 2027-2028. The thesis should materialise inside the LEAPS window — but if 2027 prints come in soft, I'm forced to choose between rolling at a loss or letting them expire.
  4. Multiple stays ~10x for a year. Possible. If FY26 prints +28% growth and GM stays ~58%, the market may keep the multiple here. In that scenario equity returns ~25-30% over the year (revenue growth flowing through with margin static). Acceptable.

Decision-Spec Application

Per references/decision-spec.md:

Rule Status
Revenue trajectory accelerating? Yes — Q4 FY25 +38.5% broke the band; FY26 guide implies 27-30% on a higher base
Leading indicators diverging up? Yes — FCB +43%, ARR +35%, NRR 125% (record), bookings +46%
Growth deceleration 2 quarters? No — Q4 reaccelerated
Management credibility? Strong — beat-and-raise 4 consecutive quarters; Axon Week deliverables on schedule
Run-rate P/S 10.2x — within reasonable band for 30%+ compounder with this FCB
Position concentration policy Top 5 = 75-85% of book; AXON top-3 by conviction → scale up to ~10-11%

Verdict per the spec: Add. Drawdown with thesis intact and leading indicators accelerating is the textbook add scenario. Rule of 40: 33.5% growth + 25.5% EBITDA = 58.5%. >55 is the sustained-compounder zone.


Comparison to the Other Personas (2026-04-28 refreshes)

Persona Action Read
Atlas Refreshed view Multiple compression, not thesis break
Saul Hold 12.4%, add on further weakness Thesis intact
Bear Hold 4-5%, add to 7-8% on Q1 confirmation Wants Q1 FY26 print first (more conservative)
Gaucho Adding LEAPS — fat-pitch setup; target ~17% Most aggressive — adding on the LEAPS specifically
Joe Hold 7%, add to 9-10% on Q1 3-of-3 Same gating as Bear

I sit between Saul/Joe and Gaucho. I'm not waiting for Q1 because the FCB tells me Q1 — $14.4B backlog with 20-25% fulfilment in 12M brackets the FY26 guide. The Q1 risk is not whether revenue prints in line, it's whether GM recovers — and that's an H2 call. I'm not buying the LEAPS at this strike (Gaucho's call) because my existing LEAPS already saturate the optionality bucket. I add equity — lower-risk delta exposure that lets me size back to conviction without re-leveraging the same expiry.


What I'm Watching for Q1 FY26 (May 2026)

Metric Bull (add more) Base (hold) Bear (trim equity, not LEAPS)
Revenue YoY ≥30% 27-30% <27%
Adj GM ≥61% 60-61% <60%
Net new ARR (Q1) ≥$110M $90-110M <$90M
FCB ≥$15B $14.5-15B <$14.5B
FY26 guide Raised to ≥30% Maintained 27-30% Lowered

Q1 FY26 historically prints in early May. Three weeks away. I'm sizing the add now because the entry beats waiting for the print, and even bear-case I trim equity (not LEAPS) — manageable.


Action

Thesis: Strengthening. Catalysts delivered (Axon Week). Leading indicators accelerating (FCB +43%, NRR record). Valuation now reasonable (11.7x EV/TTM Rev). The setup that made me cautious in February — 18x run-rate P/S — has resolved. Now it's just a matter of execution on Q1.


-wsm (Long AXON: scaling equity from 3.6% → 7%, holding Jan'28 $440 LEAPS at ~2-3%. Total target ~10-11%.)