type: framework-update tags: [guidance, annual-guide, quarterly-cadence, sandbagging, revenue-forecasting, math-check] confidence: medium created: 2026-03-31 source: HNGE stock-analysis 2026-03 persona: bert provenance: legacy source_analysis_path: null source_paragraph_quote: null source_transcript_span: null source_loss_log_path: null

Q1 vs FY Guide Arithmetic Coherence Check

When a company's Q1 revenue guide, if achieved, makes the full-year guide arithmetically implausible, the FY guide is almost certainly a floor — not a base case. The coherence test: take the Q1 midpoint guide, subtract from FY midpoint guide, divide by 3 to get implied average for Q2–Q4. If that implied quarterly run-rate is dramatically below the recent sequential trend with no supporting evidence of a structural slowdown, the FY guide is sandbagged. This can be detected at time of issuance, before any actuals confirm it.

Evidence

Implication

Add a coherence screen to every guidance assessment: (1) compute implied Q2–Q4 average from FY guide minus Q1 guide; (2) compare to recent quarterly sequential trend; (3) if the implied H2 requires deceleration of >15pp with no structural justification, treat FY guide as floor and build a bear/base/bull scenario. Bear = FY guide. Base = Q1 extrapolation with modest conservatism. Bull = Q1 guide + beat factor from consistent-beat-magnitude insight. This screen is especially powerful for newly public companies (short beat history) and when management explicitly layers conservative assumptions (flat yield, flat ASP, zero from new channels).